Skip to content

Austin 1100 vs Austin Metro l: reliability comparison

MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.

Austin 1100
76%
MOT pass rate · 52,380 vehicles
More reliable
Austin Metro l
66%
MOT pass rate · 153,180 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate, the Austin 1100 is the more reliable of the two — 76% pass first time versus 66%. It's one signal among several; check the full breakdown below.

Head to head

Measure Austin 1100 Austin Metro l
MOT pass rate 76% 66%
MOT failure rate 24% 34%
Faults & advisories per test 1.7 1.9
Dangerous-fault share 0% 0%
Average mileage 58,099 mi 58,961 mi
Sample size (vehicles) 52,380 153,180

Most common faults

Austin 1100

  1. Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
  2. Oil leak
  3. Nearside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
  4. Offside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
  5. Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
  6. Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)

Austin Metro l

  1. Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content excessive (7.3.B.1a)
  2. Offside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
  3. Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  4. Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  5. Nearside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
  6. Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)

Reliability FAQ

On MOT pass rate, the Austin 1100 is the more reliable of the two — 76% pass first time versus 66%. It's one signal among several; check the full breakdown below.

Full Austin 1100 report Full Austin Metro l report Most reliable cars

Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.