Skip to content

Austin 3000 vs Austin Metro l: reliability comparison

MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.

Austin 3000
84%
MOT pass rate · 26 vehicles
More reliable
Austin Metro l
66%
MOT pass rate · 153,180 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate, the Austin 3000 is the more reliable of the two — 84% pass first time versus 66%. It's one signal among several; check the full breakdown below.

Head to head

Measure Austin 3000 Austin Metro l
MOT pass rate 84% 66%
MOT failure rate 16% 34%
Faults & advisories per test 0.9 1.9
Dangerous-fault share 2% 0%
Average mileage 49,966 mi 58,961 mi
Sample size (vehicles) 26 153,180

Most common faults

Austin 3000

  1. Steering system has slight free play detected at steering wheel (2.2.A.1a)
  2. Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b)
  3. Offside Front wheel bearing has slight play (2.5.A.3c)
  4. Nearside Front wheel bearing has slight play (2.5.A.3c)
  5. Offside Rear Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
  6. Nearside Front Front wheel bearing has slight play (2.5.A.3c)

Austin Metro l

  1. Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content excessive (7.3.B.1a)
  2. Offside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
  3. Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  4. Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  5. Nearside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
  6. Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)

Reliability FAQ

On MOT pass rate, the Austin 3000 is the more reliable of the two — 84% pass first time versus 66%. It's one signal among several; check the full breakdown below.

Full Austin 3000 report Full Austin Metro l report Most reliable cars

Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.