Skip to content

Austin Forward control vs Austin Maestro l: reliability comparison

MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.

Austin Forward control
67%
MOT pass rate · 1 vehicles
Austin Maestro l
67%
MOT pass rate · 151,353 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate the Austin Forward control (67%) and Austin Maestro l (67%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Head to head

Measure Austin Forward control Austin Maestro l
MOT pass rate 67% 67%
MOT failure rate 33% 33%
Faults & advisories per test 2.7 1.8
Dangerous-fault share 0% 0%
Average mileage 78,333 mi 74,113 mi
Sample size (vehicles) 1 151,353

Most common faults

Austin Forward control

  1. Drop link toball joint dust cover split
  2. Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
  3. Front Headlamp not in good working order but not adversely affecting beam image (1.2.4a)
  4. Front Seat belt damaged but not affecting the operation of the belt (5.2.2a)
  5. Oil leak
  6. Nearside Front Seat belt damaged but not affecting the operation of the belt (5.2.2a)

Austin Maestro l

  1. Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content excessive (7.3.B.1a)
  2. Oil leak
  3. Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
  4. Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
  5. Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  6. Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)

Reliability FAQ

On MOT pass rate the Austin Forward control (67%) and Austin Maestro l (67%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Full Austin Forward control report Full Austin Maestro l report Most reliable cars

Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.