Skip to content

Austin Frogeye vs Austin Maestro l: reliability comparison

MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.

Austin Frogeye
81%
MOT pass rate · 3 vehicles
Austin Maestro l
67%
MOT pass rate · 151,353 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate the Austin Frogeye (81%) and Austin Maestro l (67%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Head to head

Measure Austin Frogeye Austin Maestro l
MOT pass rate 81% 67%
MOT failure rate 19% 33%
Faults & advisories per test 0.9 1.8
Dangerous-fault share 3% 0%
Average mileage 25,107 mi 74,113 mi
Sample size (vehicles) 3 151,353

Most common faults

Austin Frogeye

  1. pedal rubber missing?
  2. Offside Front Steering pivot point has excessive play (2.2.B.1g)
  3. Nearside Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
  4. Offside Front Steering rack insecure (2.2.B.1a)
  5. Offside Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
  6. both front flexi hoses close to wheels on lock

Austin Maestro l

  1. Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content excessive (7.3.B.1a)
  2. Oil leak
  3. Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
  4. Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
  5. Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  6. Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)

Reliability FAQ

On MOT pass rate the Austin Frogeye (81%) and Austin Maestro l (67%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Full Austin Frogeye report Full Austin Maestro l report Most reliable cars

Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.