Skip to content

Austin Maestro 500 cit vs Austin Metro l: reliability comparison

MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.

Austin Maestro 500 cit
56%
MOT pass rate · 3 vehicles
Austin Metro l
66%
MOT pass rate · 153,180 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate the Austin Maestro 500 cit (56%) and Austin Metro l (66%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Head to head

Measure Austin Maestro 500 cit Austin Metro l
MOT pass rate 56% 66%
MOT failure rate 44% 34%
Faults & advisories per test 3.7 1.9
Dangerous-fault share 0% 0%
Average mileage 58,703 mi 58,961 mi
Sample size (vehicles) 3 153,180

Most common faults

Austin Maestro 500 cit

  1. Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
  2. Front Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
  3. both front anti-roll bar end rubbers are perished and worn
  4. every brake pipe is corroded
  5. near side front cv boot is perished
  6. Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)

Austin Metro l

  1. Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content excessive (7.3.B.1a)
  2. Offside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
  3. Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  4. Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  5. Nearside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
  6. Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)

Reliability FAQ

On MOT pass rate the Austin Maestro 500 cit (56%) and Austin Metro l (66%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Full Austin Maestro 500 cit report Full Austin Metro l report Most reliable cars

Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.