Ford Mondeo vs Ford Rimor kilig 695 auto: reliability comparison
MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.
Ford Mondeo
70%
MOT pass rate · 1,212,823 vehicles
Ford Rimor kilig 695 auto
50%
MOT pass rate · 9 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate the Ford Mondeo (70%) and Ford Rimor kilig 695 auto (50%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.
Head to head
| Measure | Ford Mondeo | Ford Rimor kilig 695 auto |
|---|---|---|
| MOT pass rate | 70% ✓ | 50% |
| MOT failure rate | 30% ✓ | 50% |
| Faults & advisories per test | 2.2 | 1.0 ✓ |
| Dangerous-fault share | 1% | 0% ✓ |
| Average mileage | 130,467 mi | 20,911 mi |
| Sample size (vehicles) | 1,212,823 | 9 |
Most common faults
Ford Mondeo
- Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
- Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Ford Rimor kilig 695 auto
- Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect both (4.1.2 (c))
- Rear fog lamp obviously incorrectly positioned (4.5.4 (a))
Reliability FAQ
On MOT pass rate the Ford Mondeo (70%) and Ford Rimor kilig 695 auto (50%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.
Full Ford Mondeo report Full Ford Rimor kilig 695 auto report Most reliable cars
Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.