Honda Cbf 300 na-k vs Honda Cr-v: reliability comparison
MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.
Honda Cbf 300 na-k
94%
MOT pass rate · 136 vehicles
More reliable
Honda Cr-v
78%
MOT pass rate · 303,701 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate, the Honda Cbf 300 na-k is the more reliable of the two — 94% pass first time versus 78%. It's one signal among several; check the full breakdown below.
Head to head
| Measure | Honda Cbf 300 na-k | Honda Cr-v |
|---|---|---|
| MOT pass rate | 94% ✓ | 78% |
| MOT failure rate | 6% ✓ | 22% |
| Faults & advisories per test | 0.4 ✓ | 1.9 |
| Dangerous-fault share | 3% | 2% ✓ |
| Average mileage | 7,674 mi | 112,488 mi |
| Sample size (vehicles) | 136 | 303,701 |
Most common faults
Honda Cbf 300 na-k
- Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
- Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
- Steering headbearing slightly stiff or notchy (2.2.2 (f) (i))
- Exhaust noisy (8.1.1 (a))
- Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
- Front Brake lever is bent but brake can still be readily applied (1.1.2 (d))
Honda Cr-v
- Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
- Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
- Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Reliability FAQ
On MOT pass rate, the Honda Cbf 300 na-k is the more reliable of the two — 94% pass first time versus 78%. It's one signal among several; check the full breakdown below.
Full Honda Cbf 300 na-k report Full Honda Cr-v report Most reliable cars
Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.