Skip to content

Honda Cbf 600 na-4 vs Honda Cr-v: reliability comparison

MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.

Honda Cbf 600 na-4
88%
MOT pass rate · 54 vehicles
More reliable
Honda Cr-v
78%
MOT pass rate · 303,701 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate, the Honda Cbf 600 na-4 is the more reliable of the two — 88% pass first time versus 78%. It's one signal among several; check the full breakdown below.

Head to head

Measure Honda Cbf 600 na-4 Honda Cr-v
MOT pass rate 88% ✓ 78%
MOT failure rate 12% ✓ 22%
Faults & advisories per test 0.6 ✓ 1.9
Dangerous-fault share 3% 2% ✓
Average mileage 26,312 mi 112,488 mi
Sample size (vehicles) 54 303,701

Most common faults

Honda Cbf 600 na-4

  1. Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
  2. Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
  3. Front Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (3.2.A1f(i))
  4. Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i))
  5. Steering headbearing has slight free play (2.2.2)
  6. Rear Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)

Honda Cr-v

  1. Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
  2. Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
  3. Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  4. Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  5. Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  6. Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))

Reliability FAQ

On MOT pass rate, the Honda Cbf 600 na-4 is the more reliable of the two — 88% pass first time versus 78%. It's one signal among several; check the full breakdown below.

Full Honda Cbf 600 na-4 report Full Honda Cr-v report Most reliable cars

Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.