Honda Cr-v vs Honda Vfr750f-k: reliability comparison
MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.
Honda Cr-v
78%
MOT pass rate · 303,701 vehicles
Honda Vfr750f-k
84%
MOT pass rate · 530 vehicles
More reliable
Verdict: On MOT pass rate, the Honda Vfr750f-k is the more reliable of the two — 84% pass first time versus 78%. It's one signal among several; check the full breakdown below.
Head to head
| Measure | Honda Cr-v | Honda Vfr750f-k |
|---|---|---|
| MOT pass rate | 78% | 84% ✓ |
| MOT failure rate | 22% | 16% ✓ |
| Faults & advisories per test | 1.9 | 0.7 ✓ |
| Dangerous-fault share | 2% | 0% ✓ |
| Average mileage | 112,488 mi | 50,161 mi |
| Sample size (vehicles) | 303,701 | 530 |
Most common faults
Honda Cr-v
- Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
- Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
- Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Honda Vfr750f-k
- Rear Brake disc(s) slightly worn (3.2.A1l)
- Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
- Front Roller brake test indicates a binding brake (3.3.A1a)
- Nearside Front Front shock absorber has light misting of stanchion (2.3.3)
- Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
- Offside Front Front shock absorber has light misting of stanchion (2.3.3)
Reliability FAQ
On MOT pass rate, the Honda Vfr750f-k is the more reliable of the two — 84% pass first time versus 78%. It's one signal among several; check the full breakdown below.
Full Honda Cr-v report Full Honda Vfr750f-k report Most reliable cars
Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.