Skip to content

Jaguar Mark 2 2.4 vs Jaguar S-type: reliability comparison

MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.

Jaguar Mark 2 2.4
85%
MOT pass rate · 1 vehicles
Jaguar S-type
75%
MOT pass rate · 61,983 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate the Jaguar Mark 2 2.4 (85%) and Jaguar S-type (75%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Head to head

Measure Jaguar Mark 2 2.4 Jaguar S-type
MOT pass rate 85% 75%
MOT failure rate 15% 25%
Faults & advisories per test 0.2 2.1
Dangerous-fault share 0% 1%
Average mileage 84,058 mi 114,746 mi
Sample size (vehicles) 1 61,983

Most common faults

Jaguar Mark 2 2.4

  1. Front Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
  2. Horn not working (1.6.2a)
  3. Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
  4. n/s and o/s centre drag link bushes slightly worn

Jaguar S-type

  1. Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  2. Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  3. Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  4. Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  5. Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
  6. Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)

Reliability FAQ

On MOT pass rate the Jaguar Mark 2 2.4 (85%) and Jaguar S-type (75%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Full Jaguar Mark 2 2.4 report Full Jaguar S-type report Most reliable cars

Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.