Skip to content

Mercedes-benz A 160 amg line vs Mercedes-benz C: reliability comparison

MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.

Mercedes-benz A 160 amg line
96%
MOT pass rate · 147 vehicles
More reliable
Mercedes-benz C
78%
MOT pass rate · 675,043 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate, the Mercedes-benz A 160 amg line is the more reliable of the two — 96% pass first time versus 78%. It's one signal among several; check the full breakdown below.

Head to head

Measure Mercedes-benz A 160 amg line Mercedes-benz C
MOT pass rate 96% 78%
MOT failure rate 4% 22%
Faults & advisories per test 0.0 1.7
Dangerous-fault share 3%
Average mileage 60,539 mi 112,156 mi
Sample size (vehicles) 147 675,043

Most common faults

Mercedes-benz A 160 amg line

No fault breakdown available.

Mercedes-benz C

  1. Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  2. Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  3. Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
  4. Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
  5. Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
  6. Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)

Reliability FAQ

On MOT pass rate, the Mercedes-benz A 160 amg line is the more reliable of the two — 96% pass first time versus 78%. It's one signal among several; check the full breakdown below.

Full Mercedes-benz A 160 amg line report Full Mercedes-benz C report Most reliable cars

Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.