Skip to content

Mercedes-benz A160 blueeff-y classic se vs Mercedes-benz E: reliability comparison

MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.

Mercedes-benz A160 blueeff-y classic se
85%
MOT pass rate · 166 vehicles
More reliable
Mercedes-benz E
79%
MOT pass rate · 429,719 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate, the Mercedes-benz A160 blueeff-y classic se is the more reliable of the two — 85% pass first time versus 79%. It's one signal among several; check the full breakdown below.

Head to head

Measure Mercedes-benz A160 blueeff-y classic se Mercedes-benz E
MOT pass rate 85% 79%
MOT failure rate 15% 21%
Faults & advisories per test 0.0 1.6
Dangerous-fault share 3%
Average mileage 86,729 mi 124,278 mi
Sample size (vehicles) 166 429,719

Most common faults

Mercedes-benz A160 blueeff-y classic se

No fault breakdown available.

Mercedes-benz E

  1. Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  2. Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  3. Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
  4. Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
  5. Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  6. Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)

Reliability FAQ

On MOT pass rate, the Mercedes-benz A160 blueeff-y classic se is the more reliable of the two — 85% pass first time versus 79%. It's one signal among several; check the full breakdown below.

Full Mercedes-benz A160 blueeff-y classic se report Full Mercedes-benz E report Most reliable cars

Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.