Mercedes-benz C vs Mercedes-benz Vito 111 cdi: reliability comparison
MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.
Mercedes-benz C
78%
MOT pass rate · 675,043 vehicles
Mercedes-benz Vito 111 cdi
83%
MOT pass rate · 246 vehicles
More reliable
Verdict: On MOT pass rate, the Mercedes-benz Vito 111 cdi is the more reliable of the two — 83% pass first time versus 78%. It's one signal among several; check the full breakdown below.
Head to head
| Measure | Mercedes-benz C | Mercedes-benz Vito 111 cdi |
|---|---|---|
| MOT pass rate | 78% | 83% ✓ |
| MOT failure rate | 22% | 17% ✓ |
| Faults & advisories per test | 1.7 | 0.0 ✓ |
| Dangerous-fault share | 3% ✓ | 12% |
| Average mileage | 112,156 mi | 103,230 mi |
| Sample size (vehicles) | 675,043 | 246 |
Most common faults
Mercedes-benz C
- Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
- Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
- Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
- Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Mercedes-benz Vito 111 cdi
- Nearside Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
- Offside Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
- Nearside Front tyre on 2 mm. and outer wall of tyre perishing. and wearing on outer tread area.
- Nearside Rear tyre outer wall of tyre perishing.
- Offside Front tyre on 3 mm.
- Nearside Front Windscreen wiper blade defective (3.4 (b) (i))
Reliability FAQ
On MOT pass rate, the Mercedes-benz Vito 111 cdi is the more reliable of the two — 83% pass first time versus 78%. It's one signal among several; check the full breakdown below.
Full Mercedes-benz C report Full Mercedes-benz Vito 111 cdi report Most reliable cars
Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.