Mg Bt vs Mg Metro: reliability comparison
MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.
Mg Bt
69%
MOT pass rate · 4 vehicles
Mg Metro
70%
MOT pass rate · 99,203 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate the Mg Bt (69%) and Mg Metro (70%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.
Head to head
| Measure | Mg Bt | Mg Metro |
|---|---|---|
| MOT pass rate | 69% | 70% ✓ |
| MOT failure rate | 31% | 30% ✓ |
| Faults & advisories per test | 2.8 | 1.9 ✓ |
| Dangerous-fault share | 0% ✓ | 1% |
| Average mileage | 49,820 mi | 69,393 mi |
| Sample size (vehicles) | 4 | 99,203 |
Most common faults
Mg Bt
- Nearside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
- Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
- Direction indicators flashing less than 60 times a minute (1.4.A.2g)
- Nearside Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
- Nearside Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
- o/s/f tyre worn on inner edge & early cracks showing
Mg Metro
- Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content excessive (7.3.B.1a)
- Exhaust emissions hydrocarbon content excessive (7.3.B.1b)
- Nearside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
- Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
- Oil leak
- Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Reliability FAQ
On MOT pass rate the Mg Bt (69%) and Mg Metro (70%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.
Full Mg Bt report Full Mg Metro report Most reliable cars
Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.