Skip to content

Mg Metro vs Mg Mg tf spark 160: reliability comparison

MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.

Mg Metro
70%
MOT pass rate · 99,203 vehicles
Mg Mg tf spark 160
97%
MOT pass rate · 3 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate the Mg Metro (70%) and Mg Mg tf spark 160 (97%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Head to head

Measure Mg Metro Mg Mg tf spark 160
MOT pass rate 70% 97%
MOT failure rate 30% 3%
Faults & advisories per test 1.9 0.2
Dangerous-fault share 1% 0%
Average mileage 69,393 mi 32,219 mi
Sample size (vehicles) 99,203 3

Most common faults

Mg Metro

  1. Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content excessive (7.3.B.1a)
  2. Exhaust emissions hydrocarbon content excessive (7.3.B.1b)
  3. Nearside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
  4. Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
  5. Oil leak
  6. Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)

Mg Mg tf spark 160

  1. Nearside Rear wheel bearing has excessive play (2.6.2)
  2. Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  3. Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  4. Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
  5. Offside Front Track rod end ball joint has slight play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
  6. Offside Track rod end ball joint has slight play (2.1.3 (b) (i))

Reliability FAQ

On MOT pass rate the Mg Metro (70%) and Mg Mg tf spark 160 (97%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Full Mg Metro report Full Mg Mg tf spark 160 report Most reliable cars

Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.