Mg Mg 5 exclusive ev vs Mg Zs: reliability comparison
MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.
Mg Mg 5 exclusive ev
88%
MOT pass rate · 269 vehicles
More reliable
Mg Zs
74%
MOT pass rate · 38,862 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate, the Mg Mg 5 exclusive ev is the more reliable of the two — 88% pass first time versus 74%. It's one signal among several; check the full breakdown below.
Head to head
| Measure | Mg Mg 5 exclusive ev | Mg Zs |
|---|---|---|
| MOT pass rate | 88% ✓ | 74% |
| MOT failure rate | 12% ✓ | 26% |
| Faults & advisories per test | 0.5 ✓ | 1.8 |
| Dangerous-fault share | 6% | 1% ✓ |
| Average mileage | 105,087 mi | 71,653 mi |
| Sample size (vehicles) | 269 | 38,862 |
Most common faults
Mg Mg 5 exclusive ev
- Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
- Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
- Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
- Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
- Nearside Stop lamp(s) not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
- Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Mg Zs
- Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
- Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Reliability FAQ
On MOT pass rate, the Mg Mg 5 exclusive ev is the more reliable of the two — 88% pass first time versus 74%. It's one signal among several; check the full breakdown below.
Full Mg Mg 5 exclusive ev report Full Mg Zs report Most reliable cars
Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.