Mg Mgf 1.8i vvc abingdo vs Mg Zs: reliability comparison
MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.
Mg Mgf 1.8i vvc abingdo
50%
MOT pass rate · 1 vehicles
Mg Zs
74%
MOT pass rate · 38,862 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate the Mg Mgf 1.8i vvc abingdo (50%) and Mg Zs (74%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.
Head to head
| Measure | Mg Mgf 1.8i vvc abingdo | Mg Zs |
|---|---|---|
| MOT pass rate | 50% | 74% ✓ |
| MOT failure rate | 50% | 26% ✓ |
| Faults & advisories per test | 2.8 | 1.8 ✓ |
| Dangerous-fault share | 0% ✓ | 1% |
| Average mileage | 60,665 mi | 71,653 mi |
| Sample size (vehicles) | 1 | 38,862 |
Most common faults
Mg Mgf 1.8i vvc abingdo
- Nearside rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
- Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
- Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
- Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
- Nearside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
- Stop lamp remains on when the brakes are released (1.2.1e)
Mg Zs
- Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
- Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Reliability FAQ
On MOT pass rate the Mg Mgf 1.8i vvc abingdo (50%) and Mg Zs (74%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.
Full Mg Mgf 1.8i vvc abingdo report Full Mg Zs report Most reliable cars
Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.