Skip to content

Mitsubishi 2000 fto vs Mitsubishi Colt: reliability comparison

MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.

Mitsubishi 2000 fto
67%
MOT pass rate · 1 vehicles
Mitsubishi Colt
72%
MOT pass rate · 69,015 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate the Mitsubishi 2000 fto (67%) and Mitsubishi Colt (72%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Head to head

Measure Mitsubishi 2000 fto Mitsubishi Colt
MOT pass rate 67% 72% ✓
MOT failure rate 33% 28% ✓
Faults & advisories per test 1.3 ✓ 1.8
Dangerous-fault share 0% ✓ 2%
Average mileage 82,307 mi 93,728 mi
Sample size (vehicles) 1 69,015

Most common faults

Mitsubishi 2000 fto

  1. Nearside rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
  2. Offside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
  3. Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
  4. Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)

Mitsubishi Colt

  1. Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  2. Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  3. Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
  4. Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  5. Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
  6. Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))

Reliability FAQ

On MOT pass rate the Mitsubishi 2000 fto (67%) and Mitsubishi Colt (72%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Full Mitsubishi 2000 fto report Full Mitsubishi Colt report Most reliable cars

Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.