Mitsubishi Canter 35 3c13 lwb vs Mitsubishi Shogun: reliability comparison
MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.
Mitsubishi Canter 35 3c13 lwb
88%
MOT pass rate · 5 vehicles
Mitsubishi Shogun
72%
MOT pass rate · 114,544 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate the Mitsubishi Canter 35 3c13 lwb (88%) and Mitsubishi Shogun (72%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.
Head to head
| Measure | Mitsubishi Canter 35 3c13 lwb | Mitsubishi Shogun |
|---|---|---|
| MOT pass rate | 88% ✓ | 72% |
| MOT failure rate | 12% ✓ | 28% |
| Faults & advisories per test | 0.0 ✓ | 2.4 |
| Dangerous-fault share | — ✓ | 1% |
| Average mileage | 54,470 mi | 140,140 mi |
| Sample size (vehicles) | 5 | 114,544 |
Most common faults
Mitsubishi Canter 35 3c13 lwb
No fault breakdown available.
Mitsubishi Shogun
- Oil leak
- Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
- Nearside Front wheel bearing has slight play (2.5.A.3c)
Reliability FAQ
On MOT pass rate the Mitsubishi Canter 35 3c13 lwb (88%) and Mitsubishi Shogun (72%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.
Full Mitsubishi Canter 35 3c13 lwb report Full Mitsubishi Shogun report Most reliable cars
Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.