Mitsubishi Colt vs Mitsubishi Electric 4 wheel 48v 2.0 t: reliability comparison
MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.
Mitsubishi Colt
72%
MOT pass rate · 69,015 vehicles
Mitsubishi Electric 4 wheel 48v 2.0 t
—
MOT pass rate · 3 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate the Mitsubishi Colt (72%) and Mitsubishi Electric 4 wheel 48v 2.0 t (0%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.
Head to head
| Measure | Mitsubishi Colt | Mitsubishi Electric 4 wheel 48v 2.0 t |
|---|---|---|
| MOT pass rate | 72% ✓ | 0% |
| MOT failure rate | 28% | 0% ✓ |
| Faults & advisories per test | 1.8 | 0.0 ✓ |
| Dangerous-fault share | 2% | — ✓ |
| Average mileage | 93,728 mi | — |
| Sample size (vehicles) | 69,015 | 3 |
Most common faults
Mitsubishi Colt
- Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
- Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
- Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Mitsubishi Electric 4 wheel 48v 2.0 t
No fault breakdown available.
Reliability FAQ
On MOT pass rate the Mitsubishi Colt (72%) and Mitsubishi Electric 4 wheel 48v 2.0 t (0%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.
Full Mitsubishi Colt report Full Mitsubishi Electric 4 wheel 48v 2.0 t report Most reliable cars
Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.