Skip to content

Mitsubishi Evo 3 rs vs Mitsubishi L200: reliability comparison

MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.

Mitsubishi Evo 3 rs
67%
MOT pass rate · 1 vehicles
Mitsubishi L200
74%
MOT pass rate · 122,289 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate the Mitsubishi Evo 3 rs (67%) and Mitsubishi L200 (74%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Head to head

Measure Mitsubishi Evo 3 rs Mitsubishi L200
MOT pass rate 67% 74% ✓
MOT failure rate 33% 26% ✓
Faults & advisories per test 0.7 ✓ 2.3
Dangerous-fault share 0% ✓ 2%
Average mileage 164,486 mi 110,809 mi
Sample size (vehicles) 1 122,289

Most common faults

Mitsubishi Evo 3 rs

  1. Front Track rod end ball joint dust cover damaged or deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.1.3 (g) (i))
  2. Offside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))

Mitsubishi L200

  1. Offside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
  2. Nearside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
  3. Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
  4. Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
  5. Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
  6. Nearside Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))

Reliability FAQ

On MOT pass rate the Mitsubishi Evo 3 rs (67%) and Mitsubishi L200 (74%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Full Mitsubishi Evo 3 rs report Full Mitsubishi L200 report Most reliable cars

Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.