Mitsubishi L200 vs Mitsubishi Lancer evo ii: reliability comparison
MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.
Mitsubishi L200
74%
MOT pass rate · 122,289 vehicles
Mitsubishi Lancer evo ii
83%
MOT pass rate · 32 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate the Mitsubishi L200 (74%) and Mitsubishi Lancer evo ii (83%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.
Head to head
| Measure | Mitsubishi L200 | Mitsubishi Lancer evo ii |
|---|---|---|
| MOT pass rate | 74% | 83% ✓ |
| MOT failure rate | 26% | 17% ✓ |
| Faults & advisories per test | 2.3 | 0.0 ✓ |
| Dangerous-fault share | 2% | — ✓ |
| Average mileage | 110,809 mi | 153,558 mi |
| Sample size (vehicles) | 122,289 | 32 |
Most common faults
Mitsubishi L200
- Offside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
- Nearside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
- Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
- Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
- Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
- Nearside Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Mitsubishi Lancer evo ii
No fault breakdown available.
Reliability FAQ
On MOT pass rate the Mitsubishi L200 (74%) and Mitsubishi Lancer evo ii (83%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.
Full Mitsubishi L200 report Full Mitsubishi Lancer evo ii report Most reliable cars
Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.