Mitsubishi L200 vs Mitsubishi Sigma gl 2.0: reliability comparison
MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.
Mitsubishi L200
74%
MOT pass rate · 122,289 vehicles
Mitsubishi Sigma gl 2.0
—
MOT pass rate · 157 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate the Mitsubishi L200 (74%) and Mitsubishi Sigma gl 2.0 (0%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.
Head to head
| Measure | Mitsubishi L200 | Mitsubishi Sigma gl 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| MOT pass rate | 74% ✓ | 0% |
| MOT failure rate | 26% | 0% ✓ |
| Faults & advisories per test | 2.3 | 0.0 ✓ |
| Dangerous-fault share | 2% | — ✓ |
| Average mileage | 110,809 mi | — |
| Sample size (vehicles) | 122,289 | 157 |
Most common faults
Mitsubishi L200
- Offside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
- Nearside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
- Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
- Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
- Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
- Nearside Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Mitsubishi Sigma gl 2.0
No fault breakdown available.
Reliability FAQ
On MOT pass rate the Mitsubishi L200 (74%) and Mitsubishi Sigma gl 2.0 (0%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.
Full Mitsubishi L200 report Full Mitsubishi Sigma gl 2.0 report Most reliable cars
Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.