Renault Clio vs Renault Master mm35 advance e-tech ev: reliability comparison
MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.
Renault Clio
67%
MOT pass rate · 1,134,431 vehicles
Renault Master mm35 advance e-tech ev
—
MOT pass rate · 272 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate the Renault Clio (67%) and Renault Master mm35 advance e-tech ev (0%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.
Head to head
| Measure | Renault Clio | Renault Master mm35 advance e-tech ev |
|---|---|---|
| MOT pass rate | 67% ✓ | 0% |
| MOT failure rate | 33% | 0% ✓ |
| Faults & advisories per test | 2.1 | 0.0 ✓ |
| Dangerous-fault share | 1% | — ✓ |
| Average mileage | 93,744 mi | — |
| Sample size (vehicles) | 1,134,431 | 272 |
Most common faults
Renault Clio
- Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Oil leak
- Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Renault Master mm35 advance e-tech ev
No fault breakdown available.
Reliability FAQ
On MOT pass rate the Renault Clio (67%) and Renault Master mm35 advance e-tech ev (0%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.
Full Renault Clio report Full Renault Master mm35 advance e-tech ev report Most reliable cars
Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.