Skip to content

Rover 1300 princess vs Rover 214: reliability comparison

MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.

Rover 1300 princess
71%
MOT pass rate · 3 vehicles
Rover 214
68%
MOT pass rate · 184,403 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate the Rover 1300 princess (71%) and Rover 214 (68%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Head to head

Measure Rover 1300 princess Rover 214
MOT pass rate 71% 68%
MOT failure rate 29% 32%
Faults & advisories per test 1.6 1.8
Dangerous-fault share 0% 0%
Average mileage 38,793 mi 94,329 mi
Sample size (vehicles) 3 184,403

Most common faults

Rover 1300 princess

  1. n/s/f brake rubbing slightly
  2. rear sub-frame corroding
  3. Nearside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
  4. Play in steering rack inner joint(s)
  5. Rear Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
  6. N/s/f brake binding slighlty.

Rover 214

  1. Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content after 2nd fast idle excessive (7.3.D.3)
  2. Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  3. Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  4. Oil leak
  5. Exhaust emissions Lambda reading after 2nd fast idle outside specified limits (7.3.D.3)
  6. Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)

Reliability FAQ

On MOT pass rate the Rover 1300 princess (71%) and Rover 214 (68%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Full Rover 1300 princess report Full Rover 214 report Most reliable cars

Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.