Skip to content

Rover 2 door vs Rover 25: reliability comparison

MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.

Rover 2 door
56%
MOT pass rate · 3 vehicles
Rover 25
72%
MOT pass rate · 157,266 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate the Rover 2 door (56%) and Rover 25 (72%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Head to head

Measure Rover 2 door Rover 25
MOT pass rate 56% 72%
MOT failure rate 44% 28%
Faults & advisories per test 2.1 1.4
Dangerous-fault share 0% 0%
Average mileage 90,525 mi 82,004 mi
Sample size (vehicles) 3 157,266

Most common faults

Rover 2 door

  1. Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
  2. Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.5b)
  3. Centre Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
  4. Exhaust tailpipe not capable of allowing the emission probe to be inserted (7.3.D.1)
  5. Nearside Rear rear brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.5a)
  6. Nearside Rear rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)

Rover 25

  1. Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  2. Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  3. Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  4. Oil leak
  5. Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
  6. Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)

Reliability FAQ

On MOT pass rate the Rover 2 door (56%) and Rover 25 (72%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Full Rover 2 door report Full Rover 25 report Most reliable cars

Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.