Rover 2000 t vs Rover 214: reliability comparison
MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.
Rover 2000 t
100%
MOT pass rate · 1 vehicles
Rover 214
68%
MOT pass rate · 184,403 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate the Rover 2000 t (100%) and Rover 214 (68%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.
Head to head
| Measure | Rover 2000 t | Rover 214 |
|---|---|---|
| MOT pass rate | 100% ✓ | 68% |
| MOT failure rate | 0% ✓ | 32% |
| Faults & advisories per test | 0.0 ✓ | 1.8 |
| Dangerous-fault share | — | 0% |
| Average mileage | 55,218 mi | 94,329 mi |
| Sample size (vehicles) | 1 | 184,403 |
Most common faults
Rover 2000 t
No fault breakdown available.
Rover 214
- Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content after 2nd fast idle excessive (7.3.D.3)
- Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Oil leak
- Exhaust emissions Lambda reading after 2nd fast idle outside specified limits (7.3.D.3)
- Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Reliability FAQ
On MOT pass rate the Rover 2000 t (100%) and Rover 214 (68%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.
Full Rover 2000 t report Full Rover 214 report Most reliable cars
Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.