Rover 214 i sprint vs Rover 25: reliability comparison
MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.
Rover 214 i sprint
—
MOT pass rate · 670 vehicles
Rover 25
72%
MOT pass rate · 157,266 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate the Rover 214 i sprint (0%) and Rover 25 (72%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.
Head to head
| Measure | Rover 214 i sprint | Rover 25 |
|---|---|---|
| MOT pass rate | 0% | 72% ✓ |
| MOT failure rate | 0% ✓ | 28% |
| Faults & advisories per test | 0.0 ✓ | 1.4 |
| Dangerous-fault share | — | 0% |
| Average mileage | — | 82,004 mi |
| Sample size (vehicles) | 670 | 157,266 |
Most common faults
Rover 214 i sprint
No fault breakdown available.
Rover 25
- Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Oil leak
- Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
- Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Reliability FAQ
On MOT pass rate the Rover 214 i sprint (0%) and Rover 25 (72%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.
Full Rover 214 i sprint report Full Rover 25 report Most reliable cars
Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.