Skip to content

Rover 214 vs Rover 3.5 litre: reliability comparison

MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.

Rover 214
68%
MOT pass rate · 184,403 vehicles
Rover 3.5 litre
80%
MOT pass rate · 3,648 vehicles
More reliable
Verdict: On MOT pass rate, the Rover 3.5 litre is the more reliable of the two — 80% pass first time versus 68%. It's one signal among several; check the full breakdown below.

Head to head

Measure Rover 214 Rover 3.5 litre
MOT pass rate 68% 80%
MOT failure rate 32% 20%
Faults & advisories per test 1.8 1.5
Dangerous-fault share 0% 0%
Average mileage 94,329 mi 59,041 mi
Sample size (vehicles) 184,403 3,648

Most common faults

Rover 214

  1. Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content after 2nd fast idle excessive (7.3.D.3)
  2. Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  3. Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  4. Oil leak
  5. Exhaust emissions Lambda reading after 2nd fast idle outside specified limits (7.3.D.3)
  6. Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)

Rover 3.5 litre

  1. Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
  2. Oil leak
  3. Steering system has slight free play detected at steering wheel (2.2.A.1a)
  4. Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
  5. Offside rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
  6. Nearside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)

Reliability FAQ

On MOT pass rate, the Rover 3.5 litre is the more reliable of the two — 80% pass first time versus 68%. It's one signal among several; check the full breakdown below.

Full Rover 214 report Full Rover 3.5 litre report Most reliable cars

Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.