Skip to content

Rover 214 vs Rover 3.5litre: reliability comparison

MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.

Rover 214
68%
MOT pass rate · 184,403 vehicles
Rover 3.5litre
71%
MOT pass rate · 3 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate the Rover 214 (68%) and Rover 3.5litre (71%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Head to head

Measure Rover 214 Rover 3.5litre
MOT pass rate 68% 71%
MOT failure rate 32% 29%
Faults & advisories per test 1.8 2.0
Dangerous-fault share 0% 0%
Average mileage 94,329 mi 26,256 mi
Sample size (vehicles) 184,403 3

Most common faults

Rover 214

  1. Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content after 2nd fast idle excessive (7.3.D.3)
  2. Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  3. Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  4. Oil leak
  5. Exhaust emissions Lambda reading after 2nd fast idle outside specified limits (7.3.D.3)
  6. Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)

Rover 3.5litre

  1. Exhaust has part of the system slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
  2. Nearside Front Side repeater not working (1.4.A.2c)
  3. Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
  4. Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
  5. Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
  6. Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)

Reliability FAQ

On MOT pass rate the Rover 214 (68%) and Rover 3.5litre (71%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Full Rover 214 report Full Rover 3.5litre report Most reliable cars

Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.