Skip to content

Rover 214 vs Rover Mgb: reliability comparison

MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.

Rover 214
68%
MOT pass rate · 184,403 vehicles
Rover Mgb
78%
MOT pass rate · 12 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate the Rover 214 (68%) and Rover Mgb (78%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Head to head

Measure Rover 214 Rover Mgb
MOT pass rate 68% 78%
MOT failure rate 32% 22%
Faults & advisories per test 1.8 0.9
Dangerous-fault share 0% 0%
Average mileage 94,329 mi 37,704 mi
Sample size (vehicles) 184,403 12

Most common faults

Rover 214

  1. Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content after 2nd fast idle excessive (7.3.D.3)
  2. Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  3. Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  4. Oil leak
  5. Exhaust emissions Lambda reading after 2nd fast idle outside specified limits (7.3.D.3)
  6. Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)

Rover Mgb

  1. Oil leak
  2. Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.A.1)
  3. Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
  4. Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
  5. Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
  6. Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content excessive (7.3.B.1a)

Reliability FAQ

On MOT pass rate the Rover 214 (68%) and Rover Mgb (78%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Full Rover 214 report Full Rover Mgb report Most reliable cars

Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.