Skip to content

Rover 2200tc vs Rover 25: reliability comparison

MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.

Rover 2200tc
77%
MOT pass rate · 17 vehicles
Rover 25
72%
MOT pass rate · 157,266 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate the Rover 2200tc (77%) and Rover 25 (72%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Head to head

Measure Rover 2200tc Rover 25
MOT pass rate 77% 72%
MOT failure rate 23% 28%
Faults & advisories per test 1.6 1.4
Dangerous-fault share 0% 0%
Average mileage 62,743 mi 82,004 mi
Sample size (vehicles) 17 157,266

Most common faults

Rover 2200tc

  1. Oil leak
  2. Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
  3. Nearside rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
  4. Offside rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
  5. Nearside rear brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.5a)
  6. Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)

Rover 25

  1. Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  2. Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  3. Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  4. Oil leak
  5. Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
  6. Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)

Reliability FAQ

On MOT pass rate the Rover 2200tc (77%) and Rover 25 (72%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Full Rover 2200tc report Full Rover 25 report Most reliable cars

Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.