Rover 25 vs Rover 25 impression 2: reliability comparison
MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.
Rover 25
72%
MOT pass rate · 157,266 vehicles
Rover 25 impression 2
80%
MOT pass rate · 94 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate the Rover 25 (72%) and Rover 25 impression 2 (80%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.
Head to head
| Measure | Rover 25 | Rover 25 impression 2 |
|---|---|---|
| MOT pass rate | 72% | 80% ✓ |
| MOT failure rate | 28% | 20% ✓ |
| Faults & advisories per test | 1.4 | 0.0 ✓ |
| Dangerous-fault share | 0% | — |
| Average mileage | 82,004 mi | 73,882 mi |
| Sample size (vehicles) | 157,266 | 94 |
Most common faults
Rover 25
- Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Oil leak
- Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
- Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Rover 25 impression 2
No fault breakdown available.
Reliability FAQ
On MOT pass rate the Rover 25 (72%) and Rover 25 impression 2 (80%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.
Full Rover 25 report Full Rover 25 impression 2 report Most reliable cars
Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.