Skip to content

Rover 25 vs Rover Knightsbridge: reliability comparison

MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.

Rover 25
72%
MOT pass rate · 157,266 vehicles
Rover Knightsbridge
68%
MOT pass rate · 23 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate the Rover 25 (72%) and Rover Knightsbridge (68%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Head to head

Measure Rover 25 Rover Knightsbridge
MOT pass rate 72% 68%
MOT failure rate 28% 32%
Faults & advisories per test 1.4 2.5
Dangerous-fault share 0% 1%
Average mileage 82,004 mi 62,049 mi
Sample size (vehicles) 157,266 23

Most common faults

Rover 25

  1. Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  2. Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  3. Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  4. Oil leak
  5. Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
  6. Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)

Rover Knightsbridge

  1. Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
  2. Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
  3. Rear Sub-frame corroded and seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
  4. Offside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
  5. Offside Rear rear brake binding (3.7.B.1)
  6. Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content after 2nd fast idle excessive (7.3.D.3)

Reliability FAQ

On MOT pass rate the Rover 25 (72%) and Rover Knightsbridge (68%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Full Rover 25 report Full Rover Knightsbridge report Most reliable cars

Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.