Rover 25 vs Rover Mg zs: reliability comparison
MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.
Rover 25
72%
MOT pass rate · 157,266 vehicles
Rover Mg zs
82%
MOT pass rate · 1 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate the Rover 25 (72%) and Rover Mg zs (82%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.
Head to head
| Measure | Rover 25 | Rover Mg zs |
|---|---|---|
| MOT pass rate | 72% | 82% ✓ |
| MOT failure rate | 28% | 18% ✓ |
| Faults & advisories per test | 1.4 ✓ | 2.5 |
| Dangerous-fault share | 0% | 0% |
| Average mileage | 82,004 mi | 88,521 mi |
| Sample size (vehicles) | 157,266 | 1 |
Most common faults
Rover 25
- Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Oil leak
- Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
- Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Rover Mg zs
- Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
- Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened signs of overheating (3.5.1i)
- engine cover fitted obscuring components
- engine oil leak
- power steering pump noisy on lock to lock
- Nearside Front tyre wearing on inner edge
Reliability FAQ
On MOT pass rate the Rover 25 (72%) and Rover Mg zs (82%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.
Full Rover 25 report Full Rover Mg zs report Most reliable cars
Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.