Skip to content

Rover 3 door hatch vs Rover 416: reliability comparison

MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.

Rover 3 door hatch
57%
MOT pass rate · 2 vehicles
Rover 416
66%
MOT pass rate · 110,621 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate the Rover 3 door hatch (57%) and Rover 416 (66%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Head to head

Measure Rover 3 door hatch Rover 416
MOT pass rate 57% 66%
MOT failure rate 43% 34%
Faults & advisories per test 0.0 2.0
Dangerous-fault share 0%
Average mileage 51,178 mi 96,742 mi
Sample size (vehicles) 2 110,621

Most common faults

Rover 3 door hatch

  1. Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
  2. Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
  3. Nearside Rear Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)

Rover 416

  1. Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content after 2nd fast idle excessive (7.3.D.3)
  2. Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  3. Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  4. Nearside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
  5. Offside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
  6. Oil leak

Reliability FAQ

On MOT pass rate the Rover 3 door hatch (57%) and Rover 416 (66%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Full Rover 3 door hatch report Full Rover 416 report Most reliable cars

Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.