Rover 75 vs Rover 820 si 16v auto: reliability comparison
MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.
Rover 75
71%
MOT pass rate · 104,003 vehicles
Rover 820 si 16v auto
—
MOT pass rate · 998 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate the Rover 75 (71%) and Rover 820 si 16v auto (0%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.
Head to head
| Measure | Rover 75 | Rover 820 si 16v auto |
|---|---|---|
| MOT pass rate | 71% ✓ | 0% |
| MOT failure rate | 29% | 0% ✓ |
| Faults & advisories per test | 2.1 | 0.0 ✓ |
| Dangerous-fault share | 1% | — ✓ |
| Average mileage | 116,860 mi | — |
| Sample size (vehicles) | 104,003 | 998 |
Most common faults
Rover 75
- Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Nearside Front Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
- Offside Front Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Rover 820 si 16v auto
No fault breakdown available.
Reliability FAQ
On MOT pass rate the Rover 75 (71%) and Rover 820 si 16v auto (0%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.
Full Rover 75 report Full Rover 820 si 16v auto report Most reliable cars
Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.