Skip to content

Saab 2,0t vs Saab 99 gl: reliability comparison

MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.

Saab 2,0t
77%
MOT pass rate · 1 vehicles
Saab 99 gl
56%
MOT pass rate · 15,388 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate the Saab 2,0t (77%) and Saab 99 gl (56%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Head to head

Measure Saab 2,0t Saab 99 gl
MOT pass rate 77% 56%
MOT failure rate 23% 44%
Faults & advisories per test 1.9 3.0
Dangerous-fault share 0% 0%
Average mileage 123,214 mi 135,154 mi
Sample size (vehicles) 1 15,388

Most common faults

Saab 2,0t

  1. Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
  2. Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  3. Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
  4. Nearside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
  5. Offside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
  6. Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)

Saab 99 gl

  1. Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
  2. Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content excessive (7.3.B.1a)
  3. Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
  4. Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
  5. Offside Rear fog lamp not working (1.3.2b)
  6. Parking brake lever has no reserve travel (3.1.6b)

Reliability FAQ

On MOT pass rate the Saab 2,0t (77%) and Saab 99 gl (56%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Full Saab 2,0t report Full Saab 99 gl report Most reliable cars

Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.