Skip to content

Saab 9-3aero vs Saab 99 gl: reliability comparison

MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.

Saab 9-3aero
68%
MOT pass rate · 1 vehicles
Saab 99 gl
56%
MOT pass rate · 15,388 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate the Saab 9-3aero (68%) and Saab 99 gl (56%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Head to head

Measure Saab 9-3aero Saab 99 gl
MOT pass rate 68% 56%
MOT failure rate 32% 44%
Faults & advisories per test 2.4 3.0
Dangerous-fault share 0% 0%
Average mileage 175,687 mi 135,154 mi
Sample size (vehicles) 1 15,388

Most common faults

Saab 9-3aero

  1. Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
  2. Child seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt
  3. Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  4. Nearside Rear Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
  5. engine light on
  6. Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)

Saab 99 gl

  1. Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
  2. Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content excessive (7.3.B.1a)
  3. Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
  4. Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
  5. Offside Rear fog lamp not working (1.3.2b)
  6. Parking brake lever has no reserve travel (3.1.6b)

Reliability FAQ

On MOT pass rate the Saab 9-3aero (68%) and Saab 99 gl (56%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Full Saab 9-3aero report Full Saab 99 gl report Most reliable cars

Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.