Skip to content

Saab 900 turbo s 16v vs Saab 99 gl: reliability comparison

MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.

Saab 900 turbo s 16v
63%
MOT pass rate · 1 vehicles
Saab 99 gl
56%
MOT pass rate · 15,388 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate the Saab 900 turbo s 16v (63%) and Saab 99 gl (56%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Head to head

Measure Saab 900 turbo s 16v Saab 99 gl
MOT pass rate 63% 56%
MOT failure rate 37% 44%
Faults & advisories per test 3.1 3.0
Dangerous-fault share 3% 0%
Average mileage 127,727 mi 135,154 mi
Sample size (vehicles) 1 15,388

Most common faults

Saab 900 turbo s 16v

  1. Nearside Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced (1.7.5a)
  2. Offside Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced (1.7.5a)
  3. Offside Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrules (3.6.B.4e)
  4. Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))
  5. Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
  6. Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)

Saab 99 gl

  1. Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
  2. Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content excessive (7.3.B.1a)
  3. Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
  4. Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
  5. Offside Rear fog lamp not working (1.3.2b)
  6. Parking brake lever has no reserve travel (3.1.6b)

Reliability FAQ

On MOT pass rate the Saab 900 turbo s 16v (63%) and Saab 99 gl (56%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Full Saab 900 turbo s 16v report Full Saab 99 gl report Most reliable cars

Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.