Toyota Aygo vs Toyota C-hr: reliability comparison
MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.
Toyota Aygo
81%
MOT pass rate · 285,772 vehicles
Toyota C-hr
88%
MOT pass rate · 96,643 vehicles
More reliable
Verdict: On MOT pass rate, the Toyota C-hr is the more reliable of the two — 88% pass first time versus 81%. It's one signal among several; check the full breakdown below.
Head to head
| Measure | Toyota Aygo | Toyota C-hr |
|---|---|---|
| MOT pass rate | 81% | 88% ✓ |
| MOT failure rate | 19% | 12% ✓ |
| Faults & advisories per test | 1.7 | 0.9 ✓ |
| Dangerous-fault share | 3% ✓ | 4% |
| Average mileage | 60,869 mi | 48,567 mi |
| Sample size (vehicles) | 285,772 | 96,643 |
Most common faults
Toyota Aygo
- Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
- Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
- Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
- Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
- Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
- Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Toyota C-hr
- Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
- Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
- Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
- Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
- Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
- Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Reliability FAQ
On MOT pass rate, the Toyota C-hr is the more reliable of the two — 88% pass first time versus 81%. It's one signal among several; check the full breakdown below.
Full Toyota Aygo report Full Toyota C-hr report Most reliable cars
Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.