Skip to content

Volvo S40 vs Volvo Walter alexander: reliability comparison

MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.

Volvo S40
70%
MOT pass rate · 104,637 vehicles
Volvo Walter alexander
80%
MOT pass rate · 1 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate the Volvo S40 (70%) and Volvo Walter alexander (80%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Head to head

Measure Volvo S40 Volvo Walter alexander
MOT pass rate 70% 80%
MOT failure rate 30% 20%
Faults & advisories per test 2.1 1.6
Dangerous-fault share 1% 19%
Average mileage 123,409 mi 452,441 mi
Sample size (vehicles) 104,637 1

Most common faults

Volvo S40

  1. Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  2. Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  3. Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  4. Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
  5. Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
  6. Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)

Volvo Walter alexander

  1. Rear subframe corroded
  2. body and chassis corroded in various places
  3. Power steering component leaking leak at engine (2.1.5 (a))
  4. Rear Light Corrosion at Rear Sub Frame and Chassis
  5. Tail pipe slight leak
  6. Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced All Chassis and Cross members corroded (6.1.1 (c) (i))

Reliability FAQ

On MOT pass rate the Volvo S40 (70%) and Volvo Walter alexander (80%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Full Volvo S40 report Full Volvo Walter alexander report Most reliable cars

Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.