Skip to content

Triumph 1050 sprint vs Triumph 2000: reliability comparison

MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.

Triumph 1050 sprint
92%
MOT pass rate · 1 vehicles
Triumph 2000
78%
MOT pass rate · 57,492 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate the Triumph 1050 sprint (92%) and Triumph 2000 (78%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Head to head

Measure Triumph 1050 sprint Triumph 2000
MOT pass rate 92% 78%
MOT failure rate 8% 22%
Faults & advisories per test 0.5 1.6
Dangerous-fault share 17% 0%
Average mileage 28,905 mi 62,139 mi
Sample size (vehicles) 1 57,492

Most common faults

Triumph 1050 sprint

  1. Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively Slight movement on front brake disc pivots (1.1.14 (a) (i))
  2. Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
  3. slight movement in front brake disk rivets
  4. Rear Tyre has ply or cord exposed (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
  5. Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))

Triumph 2000

  1. Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
  2. Oil leak
  3. Nearside Front wheel bearing has slight play (2.5.A.3c)
  4. Offside Front wheel bearing has slight play (2.5.A.3c)
  5. Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
  6. Offside Rear wheel bearing has slight play (2.6.2)

Reliability FAQ

On MOT pass rate the Triumph 1050 sprint (92%) and Triumph 2000 (78%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.

Full Triumph 1050 sprint report Full Triumph 2000 report Most reliable cars

Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.