Triumph 2 axle rigid body vs Triumph 2000: reliability comparison
MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.
Triumph 2 axle rigid body
67%
MOT pass rate · 1 vehicles
Triumph 2000
78%
MOT pass rate · 57,492 vehicles
Verdict: On MOT pass rate the Triumph 2 axle rigid body (67%) and Triumph 2000 (78%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.
Head to head
| Measure | Triumph 2 axle rigid body | Triumph 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MOT pass rate | 67% | 78% ✓ |
| MOT failure rate | 33% | 22% ✓ |
| Faults & advisories per test | 0.7 ✓ | 1.6 |
| Dangerous-fault share | 0% | 0% |
| Average mileage | 92,583 mi | 62,139 mi |
| Sample size (vehicles) | 1 | 57,492 |
Most common faults
Triumph 2 axle rigid body
- Offside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
- Nearside Rear position lamp(s) excessively damaged so that it is not visible from a reasonable distance (1.1.A.3d)
- Offside Rear position lamp(s) excessively damaged so that it is not visible from a reasonable distance (1.1.A.3d)
- Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
- Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Triumph 2000
- Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
- Oil leak
- Nearside Front wheel bearing has slight play (2.5.A.3c)
- Offside Front wheel bearing has slight play (2.5.A.3c)
- Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
- Offside Rear wheel bearing has slight play (2.6.2)
Reliability FAQ
On MOT pass rate the Triumph 2 axle rigid body (67%) and Triumph 2000 (78%) are very close — weigh the individual measures below, and remember condition depends on age, mileage and upkeep.
Full Triumph 2 axle rigid body report Full Triumph 2000 report Most reliable cars
Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.