Skip to content

Triumph 2000 vs Triumph 3t: reliability comparison

MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.

Triumph 2000
78%
MOT pass rate · 57,492 vehicles
Triumph 3t
93%
MOT pass rate · 62 vehicles
More reliable
Verdict: On MOT pass rate, the Triumph 3t is the more reliable of the two — 93% pass first time versus 78%. It's one signal among several; check the full breakdown below.

Head to head

Measure Triumph 2000 Triumph 3t
MOT pass rate 78% 93%
MOT failure rate 22% 7%
Faults & advisories per test 1.6 0.2
Dangerous-fault share 0% 0%
Average mileage 62,139 mi 17,576 mi
Sample size (vehicles) 57,492 62

Most common faults

Triumph 2000

  1. Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
  2. Oil leak
  3. Nearside Front wheel bearing has slight play (2.5.A.3c)
  4. Offside Front wheel bearing has slight play (2.5.A.3c)
  5. Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
  6. Offside Rear wheel bearing has slight play (2.6.2)

Triumph 3t

  1. Rear wheel bearings have slight free play (2.4.A.2c)
  2. Rear Stop lamp does not illuminate immediately a brake applies (1.3.1a)
  3. Stop lamp does not illuminate immediately a brake applies (1.3.1a)
  4. Front wheel bearings have slight free play (2.3.5b)
  5. Steering headbearing has excessive free play (2.2.2)
  6. Rear Rear position lamp does not illuminate immediately when it is switched on (1.1.3a)

Reliability FAQ

On MOT pass rate, the Triumph 3t is the more reliable of the two — 93% pass first time versus 78%. It's one signal among several; check the full breakdown below.

Full Triumph 2000 report Full Triumph 3t report Most reliable cars

Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.