Skip to content

Triumph 2000 vs Triumph Street triple abs: reliability comparison

MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.

Triumph 2000
78%
MOT pass rate · 57,492 vehicles
Triumph Street triple abs
88%
MOT pass rate · 164 vehicles
More reliable
Verdict: On MOT pass rate, the Triumph Street triple abs is the more reliable of the two — 88% pass first time versus 78%. It's one signal among several; check the full breakdown below.

Head to head

Measure Triumph 2000 Triumph Street triple abs
MOT pass rate 78% 88% ✓
MOT failure rate 22% 12% ✓
Faults & advisories per test 1.6 0.5 ✓
Dangerous-fault share 0% ✓ 6%
Average mileage 62,139 mi 17,018 mi
Sample size (vehicles) 57,492 164

Most common faults

Triumph 2000

  1. Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
  2. Oil leak
  3. Nearside Front wheel bearing has slight play (2.5.A.3c)
  4. Offside Front wheel bearing has slight play (2.5.A.3c)
  5. Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
  6. Offside Rear wheel bearing has slight play (2.6.2)

Triumph Street triple abs

  1. Exhaust noisy (8.1.1 (a))
  2. Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
  3. Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
  4. Front Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))
  5. Rear reflector missing (4.8.2 (a) (ii))
  6. Drive chain slightly loose (6.1.7 (c) (i))

Reliability FAQ

On MOT pass rate, the Triumph Street triple abs is the more reliable of the two — 88% pass first time versus 78%. It's one signal among several; check the full breakdown below.

Full Triumph 2000 report Full Triumph Street triple abs report Most reliable cars

Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.