Skip to content

Triumph 2000 vs Triumph Thunderbird abs 1600: reliability comparison

MOT pass rates, common faults and mileage compared from real UK MOT data.

Triumph 2000
78%
MOT pass rate · 57,492 vehicles
Triumph Thunderbird abs 1600
90%
MOT pass rate · 254 vehicles
More reliable
Verdict: On MOT pass rate, the Triumph Thunderbird abs 1600 is the more reliable of the two — 90% pass first time versus 78%. It's one signal among several; check the full breakdown below.

Head to head

Measure Triumph 2000 Triumph Thunderbird abs 1600
MOT pass rate 78% 90%
MOT failure rate 22% 10%
Faults & advisories per test 1.6 0.5
Dangerous-fault share 0% 5%
Average mileage 62,139 mi 21,118 mi
Sample size (vehicles) 57,492 254

Most common faults

Triumph 2000

  1. Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
  2. Oil leak
  3. Nearside Front wheel bearing has slight play (2.5.A.3c)
  4. Offside Front wheel bearing has slight play (2.5.A.3c)
  5. Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
  6. Offside Rear wheel bearing has slight play (2.6.2)

Triumph Thunderbird abs 1600

  1. Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
  2. Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
  3. Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.3(ii))
  4. Exhaust noisy (8.1.1 (a))
  5. Rear Brake pad(s) close to minimum limit (1.1.13 (a))
  6. Front Brake indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (1.2.1 (e))

Reliability FAQ

On MOT pass rate, the Triumph Thunderbird abs 1600 is the more reliable of the two — 90% pass first time versus 78%. It's one signal among several; check the full breakdown below.

Full Triumph 2000 report Full Triumph Thunderbird abs 1600 report Most reliable cars

Pass rates are computed over completed (pass/fail) MOT tests. Reliability also depends on age, mileage and upkeep — see each model's page for the full picture.